Authors
Jane Mansbridge, Janette Hartz-Karp, Matthew Amengual, John Gastil
Publication date
2017/5/15
Book
Multi-Party Dispute Resolution, Democracy and Decision-Making
Pages
139-185
Publisher
Routledge
Description
Writers on the practice of deliberation usually take their cues about what deliberation ought to be from the theoretical literature, sometimes adding elements from their own experience. In this chapter, the authors begin with a review of the evolution of deliberative democratic theory. The deliberative democracy theory has passed through three stages: early theory, a period of criticism, and recent theoretical formulations. To identify the norms implied in contemporary deliberative practice, the authors collect tapes of ten small group deliberations on public issues from six organizations in the United States. The organizations provided the tapes on the basis that the tapes would be analyzed for an inductive study of deliberative norms. The deliberations captured on tape differed from one another in a number of ways, including the method of participant selection, the diversity of participants, whether the groups stood alone or …
Total citations
200620072008200920102011201220132014201520162017201820192020202120222023202421016615202136271529252421201717294
Scholar articles
J Mansbridge, J Hartz-Karp, M Amengual, J Gastil - Multi-Party Dispute Resolution, Democracy and …, 2017