Authors
William J Hinze, Carlos Aiken, John Brozena, Bernard Coakley, David Dater, Guy Flanagan, René Forsberg, Thomas Hildenbrand, G Randy Keller, James Kellogg, Robert Kucks, Xiong Li, Andre Mainville, Robert Morin, Mark Pilkington, Donald Plouff, Dhananjay Ravat, Daniel Roman, Jamie Urrutia-Fucugauchi, Marc Véronneau, Michael Webring, Daniel Winester
Publication date
2005/7
Journal
Geophysics
Volume
70
Issue
4
Pages
J25-J32
Publisher
Society of Exploration Geophysicists
Description
The North American gravity database as well as data-bases from Canada, Mexico, and the United States are being revised to improve their coverage, versatility, and accuracy. An important part of this effort is revising procedures for calculating gravity anomalies, taking into account our enhanced computational power, improved terrain databases and datums, and increased interest in more accurately defining long-wavelength anomaly components. Users of the databases may note minor differences between previous and revised database values as a result of these procedures. Generally, the differences do not impact the interpretation of local anomalies but do improve regional anomaly studies. The most striking revision is the use of the internationally accepted terrestrial ellipsoid for the height datum of gravity stations rather than the conventionally used geoid or sea level. Principal facts of gravity observations and …
Total citations
200520062007200820092010201120122013201420152016201720182019202020212022202320241146121516121020143023252720312216227