Authors
A De Silva, PW Jones, SA Spencer
Publication date
2004/11/1
Source
Archives of disease in childhood-fetal and neonatal edition
Volume
89
Issue
6
Pages
F509-F513
Publisher
BMJ Publishing Group
Description
One of the reasons for advocating human milk (HM) feeding for preterm infants is the belief that this provides the infant with a degree of protection from infection. Providing fresh HM for such infants is challenging for mothers and staff, and consequently it is important that its benefits are rigorously evaluated. Therefore a systematic review was undertaken to assess all publications concerned with human milk feeding and infection in very low birth weight (VLBW) preterm infants. Nine studies—six cohort and three randomised controlled trials (RCT)—were assessed using predefined criteria. Methodological problems included poor study design, inadequate sample size, failure to adjust for confounding variables, and inadequate definitions of HM feeding and outcome measures. In conclusion, the advantage of HM in preventing infection in preterm, (VLBW) infants is not proven by the existing studies. Recommendations …
Total citations
200520062007200820092010201120122013201420152016201720182019202020212022202320241512126647134116611934711
Scholar articles
A De Silva, PW Jones, SA Spencer - Archives of disease in childhood-fetal and neonatal …, 2004