Authors
R Baveja, K Buckshee, K Das, SK Das, MN Hazra, S Gopalan, A Goswami, BS Kodkany, CN Sujaya Kumari, K Zaveri, M Roy, S Datey, LN Gaur, NK Gupta, RN Gupta, NC Saxena, R Singh, Shiv Kumar, SC Yadav, BN Saxena
Publication date
2000/2/1
Journal
Contraception
Volume
61
Issue
2
Pages
113-119
Publisher
Elsevier
Description
The method-mix approach was used to evaluate informed contraceptive choices in the present study. A total of 8,077 potential clients were given a balanced presentation of all available contraceptive methods in the national program, ie, the CuT 200 intrauterine device (IUD), low-dose combined oral pills (OC), condom, and sterilization (female/male) along with a new method, Norplant®.1 The majority of women opted for spacing methods; among them, the IUD was preferred by about 60% of clients, followed by condoms (9%), OC (6%), and Norplant (5%). Sterilization, mainly female, was accepted by about 17% of the women making an informed choice. The economic status of couples did not influence the contraceptive choices, as all the methods were offered free of cost in the present study, which is the current practice in the national program. Illiterate women more often accepted sterilization (about 25%) than did …
Total citations
20032004200520062007200820092010201120122013201420152016201720182019202020212022202325353233122455833435