Authors
Michelle Horhota, Andrew Mienaltowski, Fredda Blanchard-Fields
Publication date
2012/5/1
Journal
Aging, Neuropsychology, and Cognition
Volume
19
Issue
3
Pages
339-361
Publisher
Taylor & Francis Group
Description
Previous research suggests that young adults can shift between rational and experiential modes of thinking when forming social judgments. The present study examines whether older adults demonstrate this flexibility in thinking. Young and older adults completed an If-only task adapted from , Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62, 328) examination of individuals' ability to adopt rational or experiential modes of thought while making a judgment about characters who experience a negative event that could have been avoided. Consistent with our expectations for their judgments of the characters, young adults shifted between experiential and rational modes of thought when instructed to do so. Conversely, regardless of the mode of thought being used or the order with which they adopted the different modes of thought (i.e., shifting from experiential to rational in Study 1 and from rational to experiential in …
Total citations
201420152016201720182019202020212022202361312111
Scholar articles
M Horhota, A Mienaltowski, F Blanchard-Fields - Aging, Neuropsychology, and Cognition, 2012