Authors
Mary E Whelan, Sinikka T Lennartz, Teresa E Gimeno, Richard Wehr, Georg Wohlfahrt, Yuting Wang, Linda MJ Kooijmans, Timothy W Hilton, Sauveur Belviso, Philippe Peylin, Róisín Commane, Wu Sun, Huilin Chen, Le Kuai, Ivan Mammarella, Kadmiel Maseyk, Max Berkelhammer, King-Fai Li, Dan Yakir, Andrew Zumkehr, Yoko Katayama, Jérôme Ogée, Felix M Spielmann, Florian Kitz, Bharat Rastogi, Jürgen Kesselmeier, Julia Marshall, Kukka-Maaria Erkkilä, Lisa Wingate, Laura K Meredith, Wei He, Rüdiger Bunk, Thomas Launois, Timo Vesala, Johan A Schmidt, Cédric G Fichot, Ulli Seibt, Scott Saleska, Eric S Saltzman, Stephen A Montzka, Joseph A Berry, J Elliott Campbell
Publication date
2018/6/18
Journal
Biogeosciences
Volume
15
Issue
12
Pages
3625-3657
Publisher
Copernicus Publications
Description
For the past decade, observations of carbonyl sulfide (OCS or COS) have been investigated as a proxy for carbon uptake by plants. OCS is destroyed by enzymes that interact with during photosynthesis, namely carbonic anhydrase (CA) and RuBisCO, where CA is the more important one. The majority of sources of OCS to the atmosphere are geographically separated from this large plant sink, whereas the sources and sinks of are co-located in ecosystems. The drawdown of OCS can therefore be related to the uptake of without the added complication of co-located emissions comparable in magnitude. Here we review the state of our understanding of the global OCS cycle and its applications to ecosystem carbon cycle science. OCS uptake is correlated well to plant carbon uptake, especially at the regional scale. OCS can be used in conjunction with other independent measures of ecosystem function, like solar-induced fluorescence and carbon and water isotope studies. More work needs to be done to generate global coverage for OCS observations and to link this powerful atmospheric tracer to systems where fundamental questions concerning the carbon and water cycle remain.
Total citations
201820192020202120222023202411122120193412