Authors
Ernesto Panadero, Jesús Alonso Tapia, Juan Antonio Huertas
Publication date
2012/12/1
Journal
Learning and individual differences
Volume
22
Issue
6
Pages
806-813
Publisher
JAI
Description
This study compares the effects of two different self-assessment tools – rubrics and scripts – on self-regulation, learning and self-efficacy in interaction with two other independent variables (type of instructions and feedback). A total of 120 secondary school students analyzed landscapes – a usual task when studying Geography – in one of twelve experimental conditions (process/performance instructions×control/rubric/script self-assessment tools×mastery/performance feedback) through three trials. Self-regulation was measured through questionnaire and thinking aloud protocols. The results of repeated-measure ANOVA showed that scripts enhanced self-regulation more than rubrics and the control group, and that the use of the two self-assessment tools increased learning over the control group. However, most interactions were not significant. Theoretical and practical implications for using rubrics and scripts in …
Total citations
201320142015201620172018201920202021202220232024122519304436414244504428