Authors
Pedro A Lemos, Patrick W Serruys, Ron T van Domburg, Francesco Saia, Chourmouzios A Arampatzis, Angela Hoye, Muzaffer Degertekin, Kengo Tanabe, Joost Daemen, Tommy KK Liu, Eugene McFadden, Georgios Sianos, Sjoerd H Hofma, Pieter C Smits, Willem J van der Giessen, Pim J de Feyter
Publication date
2004/1/20
Journal
Circulation
Volume
109
Issue
2
Pages
190-195
Publisher
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
Description
Background— The effectiveness of sirolimus-eluting stents in unselected patients treated in the daily practice is currently unknown.
Methods and Results— Sirolimus-eluting stent implantation has been used as the default strategy for all percutaneous procedures in our hospital as part of the Rapamycin-Eluting Stent Evaluated At Rotterdam Cardiology Hospital (RESEARCH) registry. Consecutive patients with de novo lesions (n=508) treated exclusively with sirolimus-eluting stents (SES group) were compared with 450 patients who received bare stents in the period just before (pre-SES group). Patients in the SES group more frequently had multivessel disease, more type C lesions, received more stents, and had more bifurcation stenting. At 1 year, the cumulative rate of major adverse cardiac events (death, myocardial infarction, or target vessel revascularization) was 9.7% in the SES group and 14.8% in the pre …
Total citations
200320042005200620072008200920102011201220132014201520162017201820192020202120222023202436912512611076655053393419814118746422