Authors
Johan Six, Stephen M Ogle, F Jay Breidt, Rich T Conant, Arvin R Mosier, Keith Paustian
Publication date
2004/2
Journal
Global change biology
Volume
10
Issue
2
Pages
155-160
Publisher
Blackwell Publishing
Description
No‐tillage (NT) management has been promoted as a practice capable of offsetting greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions because of its ability to sequester carbon in soils. However, true mitigation is only possible if the overall impact of NT adoption reduces the net global warming potential (GWP) determined by fluxes of the three major biogenic GHGs (i.e. CO2, N2O, and CH4). We compiled all available data of soil‐derived GHG emission comparisons between conventional tilled (CT) and NT systems for humid and dry temperate climates. Newly converted NT systems increase GWP relative to CT practices, in both humid and dry climate regimes, and longer‐term adoption (>10 years) only significantly reduces GWP in humid climates. Mean cumulative GWP over a 20‐year period is also reduced under continuous NT in dry areas, but with a high degree of uncertainty. Emissions of N2O drive much of the trend in net …
Total citations
20042005200620072008200920102011201220132014201520162017201820192020202120222023202431926364148586359637561607257536649634928