Authors
Daniel J Peppe, Dana L Royer, Bárbara Cariglino, Sofia Y Oliver, Sharon Newman, Elias Leight, Grisha Enikolopov, Margo Fernandez‐Burgos, Fabiany Herrera, Jonathan M Adams, Edwin Correa, Ellen D Currano, J Mark Erickson, Luis Felipe Hinojosa, John W Hoganson, Ari Iglesias, Carlos A Jaramillo, Kirk R Johnson, Gregory J Jordan, Nathan JB Kraft, Elizabeth C Lovelock, Christopher H Lusk, Ülo Niinemets, Josep Peñuelas, Gillian Rapson, Scott L Wing, Ian J Wright
Publication date
2011/5
Journal
New phytologist
Volume
190
Issue
3
Pages
724-739
Publisher
Blackwell Publishing Ltd
Description
  • Paleobotanists have long used models based on leaf size and shape to reconstruct paleoclimate. However, most models incorporate a single variable or use traits that are not physiologically or functionally linked to climate, limiting their predictive power. Further, they often underestimate paleotemperature relative to other proxies.
  • Here we quantify leaf–climate correlations from 92 globally distributed, climatically diverse sites, and explore potential confounding factors. Multiple linear regression models for mean annual temperature (MAT) and mean annual precipitation (MAP) are developed and applied to nine well‐studied fossil floras.
  • We find that leaves in cold climates typically have larger, more numerous teeth, and are more highly dissected. Leaf habit (deciduous vs evergreen), local water availability, and phylogenetic history all affect these relationships. Leaves in wet climates are larger and have fewer …
Total citations
201120122013201420152016201720182019202020212022202320241024302332374843595473544819
Scholar articles
DJ Peppe, DL Royer, B Cariglino, SY Oliver… - New Phytologist, 2011