Authors
William J Sutherland, Doug Armstrong, Stuart HM Butchart, Joanne M Earnhardt, John Ewen, Ian Jamieson, Carl G Jones, Rebecca Lee, Peter Newbery, James D Nichols, Kevin A Parker, François Sarrazin, Philip J Seddon, Nirmal Shah, Vikash Tatayah
Publication date
2010/3/29
Journal
Conservation Letters
Volume
3
Issue
4
Pages
229-235
Publisher
Blackwell Publishing Inc
Description
It would be much easier to assess the effectiveness of different reintroduction methods, and so improve the success of reintroductions, if there was greater standardization in documentation of the methods and outcomes. We suggest a series of standards for documenting and monitoring the methods and outcomes associated with reintroduction projects for birds. Key suggestions are: documenting the planned release before it occurs, specifying the information required on each release, postrelease monitoring occurring at standard intervals of 1 and 5 years (and 10 for long‐lived species), carrying out a population estimate unless impractical, distinguishing restocked and existing individuals when supplementing populations, and documenting the results. We suggest these principles would apply, largely unchanged, to other vertebrate classes. Similar methods could be adopted for invertebrates and plants with …
Total citations
20102011201220132014201520162017201820192020202120222023202419159191115131116121212119
Scholar articles
WJ Sutherland, D Armstrong, SHM Butchart… - Conservation Letters, 2010