Authors
Paul F. Burke, Christine Eckert, Stacey Davis
Publication date
2014/11/4
Journal
European Journal of Marketing
Volume
48
Issue
11/12
Pages
2237-2261
Publisher
Emerald Group Publishing Limited
Description
Purpose
– This paper aims to quantify the relative importance of reasons used to explain consumers’ selection and rejection of ethical products, accounting for differences in ethical orientations across consumers.
Design/methodology/approach
– Reviewing previous literature and drawing on in-depth interviews, a taxonomy of reasons for and against ethical purchasing is developed. An online survey incorporating best–worst scaling (BWS) determines which reasons feature more in shaping ethical consumerism. Cluster analysis and multinomial regression are used to identify and profile segments.
Findings
– Positively orientated consumers (42 per cent of respondents) purchase ethical products more so because of reasons relating to impact, health, personal relevance, and quality. Negatively orientated consumers (34 per cent of …
Scholar articles
P F. Burke, C Eckert, S Davis - European Journal of Marketing, 2014