Authors
Nanna B Finnerup, Simon Haroutounian, Peter Kamerman, Ralf Baron, David LH Bennett, Didier Bouhassira, Giorgio Cruccu, Roy Freeman, Per Hansson, Turo Nurmikko, Srinivasa N Raja, Andrew SC Rice, Jordi Serra, Blair H Smith, Rolf-Detlef Treede, Troels S Jensen
Publication date
2016/8/1
Source
Pain
Volume
157
Issue
8
Pages
1599-1606
Publisher
LWW
Description
The redefinition of neuropathic pain as “pain arising as a direct consequence of a lesion or disease affecting the somatosensory system,” which was suggested by the International Association for the Study of Pain (IASP) Special Interest Group on Neuropathic Pain (NeuPSIG) in 2008, has been widely accepted. In contrast, the proposed grading system of possible, probable, and definite neuropathic pain from 2008 has been used to a lesser extent. Here, we report a citation analysis of the original NeuPSIG grading paper of 2008, followed by an analysis of its use by an expert panel and recommendations for an improved grading system. As of February, 2015, 608 eligible articles in Scopus cited the paper, 414 of which cited the neuropathic pain definition. Of 220 clinical studies citing the paper, 56 had used the grading system. The percentage using the grading system increased from 5% in 2009 to 30% in 2014 …
Total citations
201620172018201920202021202220232024147511515415819020019899
Scholar articles