Authors
Hans Jörg Bachmann, Thomas D Bucheli, Alba Dieguez-Alonso, Daniele Fabbri, Heike Knicker, Hans-Peter Schmidt, Axel Ulbricht, Roland Becker, Alessandro Buscaroli, Diane Buerge, Andrew Cross, Dane Dickinson, Akio Enders, Valdemar I Esteves, Michael WH Evangelou, Guido Fellet, Kevin Friedrich, Gabriel Gasco Guerrero, Bruno Glaser, Ulrich M Hanke, Kelly Hanley, Isabel Hilber, Dimitrios Kalderis, Jens Leifeld, Ondrej Masek, Jan Mumme, Marina Paneque Carmona, Roberto Calvelo Pereira, Frederic Rees, Alessandro G Rombola, José Maria de La Rosa, Ruben Sakrabani, Saran Sohi, Gerhard Soja, Massimo Valagussa, Frank Verheijen, Franz Zehetner
Publication date
2016/1/20
Journal
Journal of agricultural and food chemistry
Volume
64
Issue
2
Pages
513-527
Publisher
American Chemical Society
Description
Biochar produced by pyrolysis of organic residues is increasingly used for soil amendment and many other applications. However, analytical methods for its physical and chemical characterization are yet far from being specifically adapted, optimized, and standardized. Therefore, COST Action TD1107 conducted an interlaboratory comparison in which 22 laboratories from 12 countries analyzed three different types of biochar for 38 physical–chemical parameters (macro- and microelements, heavy metals, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, pH, electrical conductivity, and specific surface area) with their preferential methods. The data were evaluated in detail using professional interlaboratory testing software. Whereas intralaboratory repeatability was generally good or at least acceptable, interlaboratory reproducibility was mostly not (20% < mean reproducibility standard deviation < 460%). This paper contributes to …
Total citations
2016201720182019202020212022202320246161017201521310
Scholar articles
HJ Bachmann, TD Bucheli, A Dieguez-Alonso… - Journal of agricultural and food chemistry, 2016