Authors
Stephen G Landt, Georgi K Marinov, Anshul Kundaje, Pouya Kheradpour, Florencia Pauli, Serafim Batzoglou, Bradley E Bernstein, Peter Bickel, James B Brown, Philip Cayting, Yiwen Chen, Gilberto DeSalvo, Charles Epstein, Katherine I Fisher-Aylor, Ghia Euskirchen, Mark Gerstein, Jason Gertz, Alexander J Hartemink, Michael M Hoffman, Vishwanath R Iyer, Youngsook L Jung, Subhradip Karmakar, Manolis Kellis, Peter V Kharchenko, Qunhua Li, Tao Liu, X Shirley Liu, Lijia Ma, Aleksandar Milosavljevic, Richard M Myers, Peter J Park, Michael J Pazin, Marc D Perry, Debasish Raha, Timothy E Reddy, Joel Rozowsky, Noam Shoresh, Arend Sidow, Matthew Slattery, John A Stamatoyannopoulos, Michael Y Tolstorukov, Kevin P White, Simon Xi, Peggy J Farnham, Jason D Lieb, Barbara J Wold, Michael Snyder
Publication date
2012/9/1
Journal
Genome research
Volume
22
Issue
9
Pages
1813-1831
Publisher
Cold Spring Harbor Lab
Description
Chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) followed by high-throughput DNA sequencing (ChIP-seq) has become a valuable and widely used approach for mapping the genomic location of transcription-factor binding and histone modifications in living cells. Despite its widespread use, there are considerable differences in how these experiments are conducted, how the results are scored and evaluated for quality, and how the data and metadata are archived for public use. These practices affect the quality and utility of any global ChIP experiment. Through our experience in performing ChIP-seq experiments, the ENCODE and modENCODE consortia have developed a set of working standards and guidelines for ChIP experiments that are updated routinely. The current guidelines address antibody validation, experimental replication, sequencing depth, data and metadata reporting, and data quality assessment. We …
Total citations
2012201320142015201620172018201920202021202220232024117316128418221118122221122422714487
Scholar articles