Authors
Peeter Värnik, Merike Sisask, Airi Värnik, Zrinka Laido, Ullrich Meise, Angela Ibelshäuser, Chantal Van Audenhove, Alexandre Reynders, Rüya-Daniela Kocalevent, Maria Kopp, Agnes Dosa, Ella Arensman, Claire Coffey, Christina M van der Feltz-Cornelis, Ricardo Gusmão, Ulrich Hegerl
Publication date
2010/10/10
Journal
Forensic Science International
Volume
202
Issue
1-3
Pages
86-92
Publisher
Elsevier
Description
OBJECTIVE
To compare suicide registration in eight European countries and provide recommendations for quality improvement.
METHOD
Qualitative data were collected from country experts using a structured questionnaire.
RESULTS
Suicide registration was based on the medico-legal system in six countries and the coronial system in two. Differences not only between, but also within these two systems emerged. Several elements crucial to the consistency of suicide registration were identified.
CONCLUSION
A precise model for recording suicides should include: an accurate legal inquiry and clarification of suicidal intent; obligatory forensic autopsy for injury deaths; reciprocal communication among authorities; electronic data transmission; final decision-makers’ access to information; trained coders.
Total citations
2010201120122013201420152016201720182019202020212022202320241591154588624834
Scholar articles