Authors
David A Lane, Alvan R Feinstein
Publication date
1998/4/1
Journal
The American journal of medicine
Volume
104
Issue
4
Pages
374-380
Publisher
Elsevier
Description
Purpose
To determine how often practicing physicians use the customarily recommended quantitative methods that include sensitivity, specificity, and likelihood ratio indexes; receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curves; and Bayesian diagnostic calculations.
Participants and Methods
A random sample of 300 practicing physicians (stratified by specialty to include family physicians, general internists, general surgeons, pediatricians, obstetrician/gynecologists, and internal medicine subspecialists) were briefly interviewed in a telephone survey. They were asked about the frequency with which they used the formal methods, the reasons for non-use, and if they employed alternative strategies when appraising tests’ diagnostic accuracy.
Results
Of the 300 surveyed physicians, 8 (3%) used the recommended formal Bayesian calculations, 3 used ROC curves, and 2 used likelihood ratios. The main reasons cited for non …
Total citations
199819992000200120022003200420052006200720082009201020112012201320142015201620172018201920202021202220232024236824145121247121555737223514134