Authors
David Freedman, David Lane
Publication date
1983/10/1
Journal
Journal of Business & Economic Statistics
Volume
1
Issue
4
Pages
292-298
Publisher
Taylor & Francis Group
Description
Tests of significance are often made in situations where the standard assumptions underlying the probability calculations do not hold. As a result, the reported significance levels become difficult to interpret. This article sketches an alternative interpretation of a reported significance level, valid in considerable generality. This level locates the given data set within the spectrum of other data sets derived from the given one by an appropriate class of transformations. If the null hypothesis being tested holds, the derived data sets should be equivalent to the original one. Thus, a small reported significance level indicates an unusual data set. This development parallels that of randomization tests, but there is a crucial technical difference: our approach involves permuting observed residuals; the classical randomization approach involves permuting unobservable, or perhaps nonexistent, stochastic disturbance terms.
Total citations
199019911992199319941995199619971998199920002001200220032004200520062007200820092010201120122013201420152016201720182019202020212022202320244323141343883391013911181515132826333427403250603820
Scholar articles
D Freedman, D Lane - Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, 1983