Authors
Marian E Betz, Shannon Frattaroli, Christopher E Knoepke, Rachel Johnson, Annette Christy, Julia P Schleimer, Veronica A Pear, Megan McCarthy, Reena Kapoor, Michael A Norko, Ali Rowhani-Rahbar, Wenjuan Ma, Garen J Wintemute, Jeffrey W Swanson, April M Zeoli
Publication date
2024/8/7
Journal
Clinical gerontologist
Volume
47
Issue
4
Pages
536-543
Publisher
Routledge
Description
Objectives
Extreme Risk Protection Orders (ERPOs) allow a court to restrict firearm access for individuals (“respondents”) at imminent risk of harm to self/others. Little is known about ERPOs use for older adults, a population with higher rates of suicide and dementia.
Methods
We abstracted ERPO cases through June 30, 2020, from California, Colorado, Connecticut, Florida, Maryland, and Washington. We restricted our analysis to petitions for older (≥65 years) respondents, stratified by documented cognitive impairment.
Results
Among 6,699 ERPO petitions, 672 (10.0%) were for older adults; 13.7% (n = 92) of these noted cognitive impairment. Most were white (75.7%) men (90.2%). Cognitively impaired (vs. non-impaired) respondents were older (mean age 78.2 vs 72.7 years) and more likely to have documented irrational/erratic behavior (30.4% vs 15.7%), but less likely to have documented suicidality (33.7% vs …
Total citations
Scholar articles