Authors
Faisal G Qureshi, Vlad C Sandulache, Ward Richardson, Orkan Ergun, Henri R Ford, David J Hackam
Publication date
2005/1/1
Journal
Journal of pediatric surgery
Volume
40
Issue
1
Pages
166-169
Publisher
WB Saunders
Description
BACKGROUND
Controversy exists regarding the timing of surgery for spontaneous pneumothorax (SP), which can be performed either after the first development of pneumothorax or after a recurrent spontaneous pneumothorax has occurred. Treatment after recurrence is often adopted because of the purported low recurrence of SP treated nonoperatively and the historical morbidity of open surgery. However, the effectiveness of VATS (to video-assisted bullectomy and pleurodesis) has raised the possibility of performing primary VATS (PV) in all patients. The authors therefore hypothesized that PV is safe and effective for SP and sought to perform a cost-benefit analysis of PV vs secondary VATS (SV).
METHODS
After institutional review board approval, consecutive patients with SP (1991-2003) and no comorbidities were retrospectively divided into PV vs SV. Demographics, recurrent pneumothorax after VATS …
Total citations
20062007200820092010201120122013201420152016201720182019202020212022202320241263548256145666751
Scholar articles
FG Qureshi, VC Sandulache, W Richardson, O Ergun… - Journal of pediatric surgery, 2005