Authors
Shuzhe Yang, Anabel Quan-Haase, Kai Rannenberg
Publication date
2017/12
Journal
New media & society
Volume
19
Issue
12
Pages
1983-2002
Publisher
SAGE Publications
Description
Since the ruling of the European Court of Justice, the right to be forgotten has provided more informational self-determination to users, whilst raising new questions around Google’s role as arbiter of online content and the power to rewrite history. We investigated the debate that unfolded on Twitter around the #righttobeforgotten through social network analysis. The results revealed that latent topics, namely Google’s role as authority, alternated in popularity with rising and fading flare topics. The public sphere, or Öffentlichkeit, that we observed resembles the traditional one, with elite players such as news portals, experts and corporations participating, but it also differs significantly in terms of the underlying mechanisms and means of information diffusion. Experts are critical to comment, relay and make sense of information. We discuss the implications for theories of the public sphere and examine why social media do …
Total citations
2016201720182019202020212022202320242311111110782