Authors
Alain de Cheveigné, Stephen McAdams, Jean Laroche, Muriel Rosenberg
Publication date
1995/6/1
Journal
The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
Volume
97
Issue
6
Pages
3736-3748
Publisher
Acoustical Society of America
Description
The improvement of identification accuracy of concurrent vowels with differences in fundamental frequency (ΔF0) is usually attributed to mechanisms that exploit harmonic structure. To decide whether identification is aided primarily by selecting the target vowel on the basis of its harmonic structure (‘‘harmonic enhancement’’) or removing the interfering vowel on the basis of its harmonic structure (‘‘harmonic cancellation’’), pairs of synthetic vowels, each of which was either harmonic or inharmonic, were presented to listeners for identification. Responses for each vowel were scored according to the vowel’s harmonicity and that of the vowel that accompanied it. For a given target, identification was better by about 3% for a harmonic ground unless the target was also harmonic with the same F0. This supports the cancellation hypothesis. Identification was worse for harmonic than for inharmonic targets by 3%–8%. This …
Total citations
1994199519961997199819992000200120022003200420052006200720082009201020112012201320142015201620172018201920202021202220231138474224241444153124756525472
Scholar articles
A de Cheveigné, S McAdams, J Laroche, M Rosenberg - The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1995