Authors
Kevin C Nixon, James M Carpenter
Publication date
1996/12/1
Journal
Cladistics
Volume
12
Issue
4
Pages
305-321
Publisher
No longer published by Elsevier
Description
Consensus in cladistics is reviewed. Consensus trees, which summarize the agreement in grouping among a set of cladograms, are distinguished from compromise trees, which may contain groups that do not appear in all the cladograms being compared. Only a strict or Nelson tree is an actual consensus. This distinction has implications for the concept of support for cladograms: only those branches supported under all possible optimizations are unambiguously supported. We refer to such cladograms as strictly supported, in contrast to the semistrictly (ambiguously) supported cladograms output by various current microcomputer programs for cladistic analysis. Such semistrictly supported cladograms may be collapsed, however, by a variety of options in various programs. Consideration of collapsibility and optimization on multifurcations leads to some conclusions on the use of consensus. Consensus tree length …
Total citations
19981999200020012002200320042005200620072008200920102011201220132014201520162017201820192020202120222023107914111713938738105119561521342