Authors
Ed Diener, Daniel Kahneman, Raksha Arora, James Harter, William Tov
Publication date
2009
Journal
Assessing Well-Being
Pages
233-246
Publisher
Springer Netherlands
Description
Findings are presented indicating that measures of subjective well-being can be ordered along a dimension varying from evaluative judgments of life at one end to experienced affect at the other. A debate in recent decades has focused on whether increasing income raises the experience of well-being. We found that judgment measures are more strongly associated with income and with the long-term changes of national income. Measures of affect showed lower correlations with income in cross-sectional analyses, as well as lower associations with long-term rising income. Measures of concepts such as “Happiness” and “Life Satisfaction” appear to be saturated with varying mixtures of judgment and affect, and this is reflected in the degree to which they correlate with income. The results indicate that measures of well-being fall along one dimension with different factors influencing scores at each end. Both …
Total citations
2010201120122013201420152016201720182019202020212022202320242381399814119122114115
Scholar articles
E Diener, D Kahneman, R Arora, J Harter, W Tov - Assessing well-being: The collected works of Ed …, 2009
E Diener, D Wirtz, R Biswas-Diener, W Tov… - American Psychological Association, 2009