View article

Islands are increasingly used to protect endangered populations from the negative impacts of invasive species. Quarantine efforts are particularly likely to be undervalued in circumstances where a failure incurs non-economic costs. One approach to ascribe value to such efforts is by modeling the expense of restoring a system to its former state.

Using field-based removal experiments on two very different islands off northern Australia separated by > 400 km, we estimate cane toad densities, detection probabilities, and the resulting effort needed to eradicate toads from an island, and use these estimates to examine the financial benefit of cane toad quarantine across offshore islands prioritized for conversation management by the Australian federal government.

We calculate density as animals per km of freshwater shoreline, and find striking concordance of density across our two island study sites: a mean density of 353 [286, 446] individual toads per kilometer on one island, and a density of 366 [319, 343] on the second. Detection probability differed between the two islands.

Using a removal model and the financial costs incurred during toad removal, we estimate that eradicating cane toads would, on average, cost between $9444 (based on Horan Island; high detectability) and $18093 AUD (Indian Island; low detectability) per km of available freshwater shoreline.

Across islands that have been prioritized for conservation benefit within the toads’ predicted range, we provide an estimate of the value of toad quarantine on each island, and estimate the net value of quarantine efforts to be between $27.25 – $52.20 Million AUD. We explore a proposed …