Authors
Lynn C Miller, Sonia Jawaid Shaikh, David C Jeong, Liyuan Wang, Traci K Gillig, Carlos G Godoy, Paul R Appleby, Charisse L Corsbie-Massay, Stacy Marsella, John L Christensen, Stephen J Read
Publication date
2019/10/2
Journal
Psychological inquiry
Volume
30
Issue
4
Pages
173-202
Publisher
Routledge
Description
Causal inference and generalizability both matter. Historically, systematic designs emphasize causal inference, while representative designs focus on generalizability. Here, we suggest a transformative synthesis – Systematic Representative Design (SRD) – concurrently enhancing both causal inference and “built-in” generalizability by leveraging today’s intelligent agent, virtual environments, and other technologies. In SRD, a “default control group” (DCG) can be created in a virtual environment by representatively sampling from real-world situations. Experimental groups can be built with systematic manipulations onto the DCG base. Applying systematic design features (e.g., random assignment to DCG versus experimental groups) in SRD affords valid causal inferences. After explicating the proposed SRD synthesis, we delineate how the approach concurrently advances generalizability and robustness, cause …
Total citations
2019202020212022202320241351062
Scholar articles
LC Miller, SJ Shaikh, DC Jeong, L Wang, TK Gillig… - Psychological inquiry, 2019