Authors
Jonathan Lambert, Peter B Greer, Fred Menk, Jackie Patterson, Joel Parker, Kara Dahl, Sanjiv Gupta, Anne Capp, Chris Wratten, Colin Tang, Mahesh Kumar, Jason Dowling, Sarah Hauville, Cynthia Hughes, Kristen Fisher, Peter Lau, James W Denham, Olivier Salvado
Publication date
2011/3/1
Journal
Radiotherapy and Oncology
Volume
98
Issue
3
Pages
330-334
Publisher
Elsevier
Description
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE
Dose planning requires a CT scan which provides the electron density distribution for dose calculation. MR provides superior soft tissue contrast compared to CT and the use of MR-alone for prostate planning would provide further benefits such as lower cost to the patient. This study compares the accuracy of MR-alone based dose calculations with bulk electron density assignment to CT-based dose calculations for prostate radiotherapy.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
CT and whole pelvis MR images were contoured for 39 prostate patients. Plans with uniform density and plans with bulk density values assigned to bone and tissue were compared to the patient’s gold standard full density CT plan. The optimal bulk density for bone was calculated using effective depth measurements. The plans were evaluated using ICRU point doses, dose volume histograms, and Chi comparisons …
Total citations
20112012201320142015201620172018201920202021202220232024269152493118201451137
Scholar articles