Authors
Arik Kershenbaum, Daniel T Blumstein, Marie A Roch, Çağlar Akçay, Gregory Backus, Mark A Bee, Kirsten Bohn, Yan Cao, Gerald Carter, Cristiane Cäsar, Michael Coen, Stacy L DeRuiter, Laurance Doyle, Shimon Edelman, Ramon Ferrer‐i‐Cancho, Todd M Freeberg, Ellen C Garland, Morgan Gustison, Heidi E Harley, Chloe Huetz, Melissa Hughes, Julia Hyland Bruno, Amiyaal Ilany, Dezhe Z Jin, Michael Johnson, Chenghui Ju, Jeremy Karnowski, Bernard Lohr, Marta B Manser, Brenda McCowan, Eduardo Mercado III, Peter M Narins, Alex Piel, Megan Rice, Roberta Salmi, Kazutoshi Sasahara, Laela Sayigh, Yu Shiu, Charles Taylor, Edgar E Vallejo, Sara Waller, Veronica Zamora‐Gutierrez
Publication date
2016/2
Source
Biological Reviews
Volume
91
Issue
1
Pages
13-52
Publisher
Blackwell Publishing Ltd
Description
Animal acoustic communication often takes the form of complex sequences, made up of multiple distinct acoustic units. Apart from the well‐known example of birdsong, other animals such as insects, amphibians, and mammals (including bats, rodents, primates, and cetaceans) also generate complex acoustic sequences. Occasionally, such as with birdsong, the adaptive role of these sequences seems clear (e.g. mate attraction and territorial defence). More often however, researchers have only begun to characterise – let alone understand – the significance and meaning of acoustic sequences. Hypotheses abound, but there is little agreement as to how sequences should be defined and analysed. Our review aims to outline suitable methods for testing these hypotheses, and to describe the major limitations to our current and near‐future knowledge on questions of acoustic sequences. This review and prospectus is …
Total citations
20152016201720182019202020212022202320244232730263044474713
Scholar articles
A Kershenbaum, DT Blumstein, MA Roch, Ç Akçay… - Biological Reviews, 2016