Authors
Michael J Peluso, Saki Takahashi, Jill Hakim, J Daniel Kelly, Leonel Torres, Nikita S Iyer, Keirstinne Turcios, Owen Janson, Sadie E Munter, Cassandra Thanh, Joanna Donatelli, Christopher C Nixon, Rebecca Hoh, Viva Tai, Emily A Fehrman, Yanel Hernandez, Matthew A Spinelli, Monica Gandhi, Mary-Ann Palafox, Ana Vallari, Mary A Rodgers, John Prostko, John Hackett Jr, Lan Trinh, Terri Wrin, Christos J Petropoulos, Charles Y Chiu, Philip J Norris, Clara DiGermanio, Mars Stone, Michael P Busch, Susanna K Elledge, Xin X Zhou, James A Wells, Albert Shu, Theodore W Kurtz, John E Pak, Wesley Wu, Peter D Burbelo, Jeffrey I Cohen, Rachel L Rutishauser, Jeffrey N Martin, Steven G Deeks, Timothy J Henrich, Isabel Rodriguez-Barraquer, Bryan Greenhouse
Publication date
2021/7/30
Journal
Science advances
Volume
7
Issue
31
Pages
eabh3409
Publisher
American Association for the Advancement of Science
Description
Interpretation of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) serosurveillance studies is limited by poorly defined performance of antibody assays over time in individuals with different clinical presentations. We measured antibody responses in plasma samples from 128 individuals over 160 days using 14 assays. We found a consistent and strong effect of disease severity on antibody magnitude, driven by fever, cough, hospitalization, and oxygen requirement. Responses to spike protein versus nucleocapsid had consistently higher correlation with neutralization. Assays varied substantially in sensitivity during early convalescence and time to seroreversion. Variability was dramatic for individuals with mild infection, who had consistently lower antibody titers, with sensitivities at 6 months ranging from 33 to 98% for commercial assays. Thus, the ability to detect previous infection by SARS-CoV-2 is …
Total citations
202120222023202426643112
Scholar articles