Authors
David R Just, Collin R Payne
Publication date
2009/12/1
Source
Annals of Behavioral Medicine
Volume
38
Issue
suppl_1
Pages
s47-s55
Publisher
Oxford University Press
Description
Background
Consumers regularly and predictably behave in ways that contradict standard assumptions of economic analysis such that they make decisions that prevent them from reaching rationally intended goals. These contradictions play a significant role with respect to consumers’ food decisions and the effect these decisions have on their health.
Discussion
Food decisions that are rationally derived include those that trade short-term gains of sensory pleasure (hedonic) for longer term gains of health and wellness (utilitarian). However, extra-rational food decisions are much more common. They can occur because of the contexts in which they are made—such as being distracted or pressed for time. In these contexts, heuristics (or rules of thumb) are used. Because food decisions are made with little cognitive involvement, food policies designed to appeal to highly cognitive …
Total citations
20092010201120122013201420152016201720182019202020212022202320241312101816131618128781421
Scholar articles
DR Just, CR Payne - Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 2009