Authors
Christopher C Butler, Josep Vidal-Alaball, Rebecca Cannings-John, Andrew McCaddon, Kerenza Hood, Alexandra Papaioannou, Ian Mcdowell, Andrew Goringe
Publication date
2006/6/1
Source
Family practice
Volume
23
Issue
3
Pages
279-285
Publisher
Oxford University Press
Description
Background. Vitamin B12 deficiency is common, increasing with age. Most people are treated in primary care with intramuscular vitamin B12. Several studies have reported equal efficacy of oral administration of vitamin B12.
Objectives. We set out to identify randomized controlled trial (RCT) evidence for the effectiveness of oral versus intramuscular vitamin B12 to treat vitamin B12 deficiency.
Methods. We conducted a systematic review searching databases for relevant RCTs. Outcomes included levels of serum vitamin B12, total serum homocysteine and methylmalonic acid, haemoglobin and signs and symptoms of vitamin B12 deficiency.
Results. Two RCTs comparing oral with intramuscular administration of vitamin B12 met our inclusion criteria. The trials recruited a total of 108 participants and followed up 93 of these from 90 days to 4 months. In one of the studies, mean …
Total citations
200620072008200920102011201220132014201520162017201820192020202120222023202428131512162420201511820162116191113