Authors
Emily Talen
Publication date
2002/1/1
Journal
Housing policy debate
Volume
13
Issue
1
Pages
165-188
Publisher
Taylor & Francis Group
Description
New Urbanism is most often appraised in terms of its physical design, while analysis of its social goals is limited to unsubstantiated claims about New Urbanists’ desire to engage in social engineering. This article presents the results of an evaluation of the explicit, stated link between the physical planning proposals of New Urbanism and three types of social goals: community, social equity, and the common good. The analysis is based on the Charter of the New Urbanism, which describes each core principle in detail.
Of the 27 principles, 8 are related to equity, while 19 are connected to promoting the common good. None of the principles is explicitly related to community, although notions of community are often invoked for descriptive purposes. It is hoped that these results will help clarify the discussion of the relationship between physical planning and social goals in the context of New Urbanism.
Total citations
20022003200420052006200720082009201020112012201320142015201620172018201920202021202220232024133861311911122414191918201819151815139
Scholar articles