Authors
Laury PJWM de Jonge, Angelique A Timmerman, Marjan JB Govaerts, Jean WM Muris, Arno MM Muijtjens, Anneke WM Kramer, Cees PM van der Vleuten
Publication date
2017/12
Journal
Advances in Health Sciences Education
Volume
22
Pages
1213-1243
Publisher
Springer Netherlands
Description
Workplace-Based Assessment (WBA) plays a pivotal role in present-day competency-based medical curricula. Validity in WBA mainly depends on how stakeholders (e.g. clinical supervisors and learners) use the assessments—rather than on the intrinsic qualities of instruments and methods. Current research on assessment in clinical contexts seems to imply that variable behaviours during performance assessment of both assessors and learners may well reflect their respective beliefs and perspectives towards WBA. We therefore performed a Q methodological study to explore perspectives underlying stakeholders’ behaviours in WBA in a postgraduate medical training program. Five different perspectives on performance assessment were extracted: Agency, Mutuality, Objectivity, Adaptivity and Accountability. These perspectives reflect both differences and similarities in stakeholder perceptions and …
Total citations
20172018201920202021202220232024226714674
Scholar articles