View article

There is growing interest on founding healthcare system based on value. Value is here the outcomes acheived by patient per the cost. For a long time, high income countries took in account only the clinical outcomes measures (clinical indicator) as the important outcomes to consider. But, theses measures were limitated because they weren't captured how patients felt the cares they received especially their satisfaction of theses cares. Theses aspects are very important to assess the quality of the care patients received from the healthcare system. They are also important component of health care system performance. Thus recently, high income countries moved their interests on the use of patient reported outcomes measures (PROMS) and patient reported experiences measures (PREMS). Although, many country or theirs health regions or health facilities implementated a system to collect theses measures for clinical decision making or research; there is no evidence to date; that help or enhance policy decision making or decision making on goverment and health administator level. This systematic scoping review aimed to summary the implementation of self-reported measurement systems used to guide decision making at goverment level or region health system level. Methods Eligibility criteria: Intervention (s)/Exposure (s): Measurement system aimed at patient or population health containing self-reported data Comparator (s)/Control (s): None Participants/Population: Government agencies, organizations, and administrations Outcomes: Impacts on decision making support; Barriers and facilitators to implementation, Care quality improvement …