Authors
Samireh Jalali, Claes Wohlin
Publication date
2012/9/19
Source
Proceedings of the ACM-IEEE international symposium on Empirical software engineering and measurement
Pages
29-38
Description
Systematic studies of the literature can be done in different ways. In particular, different guidelines propose different first steps in their recommendations, e.g. start with search strings in different databases or start with the reference lists of a starting set of papers.
In software engineering, the main recommended first step is using search strings in a number of databases, while in information systems, snowballing has been recommended as the first step. This paper compares the two different search approaches for conducting literature review studies.
The comparison is conducted by searching for articles addressing "Agile practices in global software engineering". The focus of the paper is on evaluating the two different search approaches.
Despite the differences in the included papers, the conclusions and the patterns found in both studies are quite similar. The strengths and weaknesses of each first step are discussed …
Total citations
20132014201520162017201820192020202120222023202424295963857010010511413313466
Scholar articles
S Jalali, C Wohlin - Proceedings of the ACM-IEEE international symposium …, 2012