Authors
Alessandro D Loguercio, Eloisa Andrade De Paula, Viviane Hass, Issis Luque-Martinez, Alessandra Reis, Jorge Perdigão
Publication date
2015/9/1
Journal
Journal of dentistry
Volume
43
Issue
9
Pages
1083-1092
Publisher
Elsevier
Description
Statement of the problem
It is still debatable which technique should be used with universal adhesives, either etch-and-rinse (wet or dry) or self-etch strategy (with or without selective enamel etching).
Purpose of the study
To evaluate the 36-month clinical performance of Scotchbond Universal Adhesive (SU, 3M ESPE) in non-carious cervical lesions (NCCLs) using two evaluation criteria.
Methods/materials
Thirty-nine patients participated in this study. Two-hundred restorations were assigned to four groups: ERm: etch-and-rinse + moist dentin; ERd: etch-and-rinse + dry dentin; Set: selective enamel etching; and SE: self-etch. The same composite resin was inserted for all restorations in up to 3 increments. The restorations were evaluated at baseline and at 6-, 18-, and 36-months using both the FDI and the USPHS criteria. Statistical analyses were performed with Friedman repeated measures ANOVA by rank and …
Total citations
20152016201720182019202020212022202320243202137414533332310
Scholar articles
AD Loguercio, EA De Paula, V Hass, I Luque-Martinez… - Journal of dentistry, 2015