Authors
Kei Asayama, Lutgarde Thijs, Yan Li, Yu-Mei Gu, Azusa Hara, Yan-Ping Liu, Zhenyu Zhang, Fang-Fei Wei, Ines Lujambio, Luis J Mena, Jose Boggia, Tine W Hansen, Kristina Björklund-Bodegård, Kyoko Nomura, Takayoshi Ohkubo, Jørgen Jeppesen, Christian Torp-Pedersen, Eamon Dolan, Katarzyna Stolarz-Skrzypek, Sofia Malyutina, Edoardo Casiglia, Yuri Nikitin, Lars Lind, Leonella Luzardo, Kalina Kawecka-Jaszcz, Edgardo Sandoya, Jan Filipovský, Gladys E Maestre, Jiguang Wang, Yutaka Imai, Stanley S Franklin, Eoin O’Brien, Jan A Staessen
Publication date
2014/11
Journal
Hypertension
Volume
64
Issue
5
Pages
935-942
Publisher
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
Description
Outcome-driven recommendations about time intervals during which ambulatory blood pressure should be measured to diagnose white-coat or masked hypertension are lacking. We cross-classified 8237 untreated participants (mean age, 50.7 years; 48.4% women) enrolled in 12 population studies, using ≥140/≥90, ≥130/≥80, ≥135/≥85, and ≥120/≥70 mm Hg as hypertension thresholds for conventional, 24-hour, daytime, and nighttime blood pressure. White-coat hypertension was hypertension on conventional measurement with ambulatory normotension, the opposite condition being masked hypertension. Intervals used for classification of participants were daytime, nighttime, and 24 hours, first considered separately, and next combined as 24 hours plus daytime or plus nighttime, or plus both. Depending on time intervals chosen, white-coat and masked hypertension frequencies ranged from 6.3% to 12.5 …
Total citations
20132014201520162017201820192020202120222023202411413162125281520196