Authors
James E Corter, Jeffrey V Nickerson, Sven K Esche, Constantin Chassapis, Seongah Im, Jing Ma
Publication date
2007/8/1
Journal
ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI)
Volume
14
Issue
2
Pages
7-es
Publisher
ACM
Description
Laboratories play a crucial role in the education of future scientists and engineers, yet there is disagreement among science and engineering educators about whether and which types of technology-enabled labs should be used. This debate could be advanced by large-scale randomized studies addressing the critical issue of whether remotely operated or simulation-based labs are as effective as the traditional hands-on lab format. The present article describes the results of a large-scale (N = 306) study comparing learning outcomes and student preferences for several different lab formats in an undergraduate engineering course. The lab formats that were evaluated included traditional hands-on labs, remotely operated labs, and simulations. Learning outcomes were assessed by a test of the specific concepts taught in each lab. These knowledge scores were as high or higher (depending on topic) after performing …
Total citations
200620072008200920102011201220132014201520162017201820192020202120222023202414131617272531182729251625202823137
Scholar articles
JE Corter, JV Nickerson, SK Esche, C Chassapis, S Im… - ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction …, 2007