Authors
Fiona Alice Miller, Jason Scott Robert, Robin Z Hayeems
Publication date
2009/2
Journal
American journal of public health
Volume
99
Issue
2
Pages
210-215
Publisher
American Public Health Association
Description
An apparent consensus governs the management of carrier status information generated incidentally through newborn screening: results cannot be withheld from parents. This normative stance encodes the focus on autonomy and distaste for paternalism that characterize the principles of clinical bioethics.
However, newborn screening is a classic public health intervention in which paternalism may trump autonomy and through which parents are—in effect—required to receive carrier information. In truth, the disposition of carrier results generates competing moral infringements: to withhold information or require its possession.
Resolving this dilemma demands consideration of a distinctive body of public health ethics to highlight the moral imperatives associated with the exercise of collective authority in the pursuit of public health benefits.
Total citations
20092010201120122013201420152016201720182019202020212022202320245574333431231
Scholar articles