Authors
Marek Smieja, Dereck L Hunt, David Edelman, Edward Etchells, Jacques Cornuz, David L Simel, International Cooperative Group for Clinical Examination Research
Publication date
1999/7
Journal
Journal of general internal medicine
Volume
14
Issue
7
Pages
418-424
Publisher
Blackwell Science Inc
Description
OBJECTIVE: We compared the reproducibility and accuracy of conventional clinical examination of the diabetic foot to monofilament examination. We also sought to simplify the monofilament examination by reducing it to fewer touch points.
METHODS: In a cross‐sectional study at 10 centers in the United States, Canada, and Switzerland, general internists and residents performed a structured history and physical examination for neuropathy on the feet of diabetic patients. Independent examination by two observers included monofilament sensation, pinprick, vibration, position sense, and ankle reflexes.
MAIN RESULTS: A total of 304 patients were examined by at least one practitioner, and 200 received duplicate examinations. Monofilament examination and ankle reflexes had the best reproducibility, with moderate agreement (κ= 0.59); pinprick, position, and vibration sense had fair agreement (κ= 0.28–0.36). No …
Total citations
20002001200220032004200520062007200820092010201120122013201420152016201720182019202020212022202320243685771651212108182410141491912125466
Scholar articles
M Smieja, DL Hunt, D Edelman, E Etchells, J Cornuz… - Journal of general internal medicine, 1999