Authors
Jens B Asendorpf, Mark Conner, Filip De Fruyt, Jan De Houwer, Jaap JA Denissen, Klaus Fiedler, Susann Fiedler, David C Funder, Reinhold Kliegl, Brian A Nosek, Marco Perugini, Brent W Roberts, Manfred Schmitt, Marcel AG Van Aken, Hannelore Weber, Jelte M Wicherts
Publication date
2013/3
Journal
European journal of personality
Volume
27
Issue
2
Pages
108-119
Publisher
SAGE Publications
Description
Replicability of findings is at the heart of any empirical science. The aim of this article is to move the current replicability debate in psychology towards concrete recommendations for improvement. We focus on research practices but also offer guidelines for reviewers, editors, journal management, teachers, granting institutions, and university promotion committees, highlighting some of the emerging and existing practical solutions that can facilitate implementation of these recommendations. The challenges for improving replicability in psychological science are systemic. Improvement can occur only if changes are made at many levels of practice, evaluation, and reward. Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Total citations
201320142015201620172018201920202021202220232024137983108102118101115100958741
Scholar articles
JB Asendorpf, M Conner, F De Fruyt, J De Houwer… - European journal of personality, 2013