Authors
Logan L Watts, E Michelle Todd, Tyler J Mulhearn, Kelsey E Medeiros, Michael D Mumford, Shane Connelly
Publication date
2017/5/19
Source
Accountability in Research
Volume
24
Issue
4
Pages
225-242
Publisher
Taylor & Francis
Description
Although qualitative research offers some unique advantages over quantitative research, qualitative methods are rarely employed in the evaluation of ethics education programs and are often criticized for a lack of rigor. This systematic review investigated the use of qualitative methods in studies of ethics education. Following a review of the literature in which 24 studies were identified, each study was coded based on 16 best practices characteristics in qualitative research. General thematic analysis and grounded theory were found to be the dominant approaches used. Researchers are effectively executing a number of best practices, such as using direct data sources, structured data collection instruments, non-leading questioning, and expert raters. However, other best practices were rarely present in the courses reviewed, such as collecting data using multiple sources, methods, raters, and timepoints, evaluating …
Total citations
20182019202020212022202320248718161996
Scholar articles