Authors
JAMES M CHAMBERLAIN, MICHAEL A ALTIERI, CRAIG FUTTERMAN, GRACE M YOUNG, DANIEL W OCHSENSCHLAGER, YEHESKEL WAISMAN
Publication date
1997/4/1
Journal
Pediatric emergency care
Volume
13
Issue
2
Pages
92-94
Publisher
LWW
Description
Objective: To compare treatment of ongoing seizures using intramuscular (IM) midazolam versus intravenous (IV) diazepam
Design: Controlled clinical trial
Patients: Children with motor seizures of at least 10 minutes' duration
Main outcome measures: Time to cessation of seizures
Results: Twenty-four patients were enrolled (13 midazolam, 11 diazepam). Initial treatment with either midazolam or diazepam was successful in 22 of the 24 patients. One patient in each group failed therapy and eventually required endotracheal intubation and general anesthesia for convulsive status epilepticus lasting more than one hour. Patients in the midazolam group received medication sooner (3.3+/-2.0 vs 7.8+/-3.2 minutes, P= 0.001) and had more rapid cessation of their seizures (7.8+/-4.1 vs 11.2+/-3.6, P= 0.047) than patients randomized to receive diazepam
Conclusions: IM midazolam is an effective anticonvulsant for children …
Total citations
19981999200020012002200320042005200620072008200920102011201220132014201520162017201820192020202120222023202455731286991351116913618171177738734