Authors
Sarvenaz Choobdar, Mehmet E Ahsen, Jake Crawford, Mattia Tomasoni, Tao Fang, David Lamparter, Junyuan Lin, Benjamin Hescott, Xiaozhe Hu, Johnathan Mercer, Ted Natoli, Rajiv Narayan, Aravind Subramanian, Jitao D Zhang, Gustavo Stolovitzky, Zoltán Kutalik, Kasper Lage, Donna K Slonim, Julio Saez-Rodriguez, Lenore J Cowen, Sven Bergmann, Daniel Marbach
Publication date
2019/9
Journal
Nature methods
Volume
16
Issue
9
Pages
843-852
Publisher
Nature Publishing Group US
Description
Many bioinformatics methods have been proposed for reducing the complexity of large gene or protein networks into relevant subnetworks or modules. Yet, how such methods compare to each other in terms of their ability to identify disease-relevant modules in different types of network remains poorly understood. We launched the ‘Disease Module Identification DREAM Challenge’, an open competition to comprehensively assess module identification methods across diverse protein–protein interaction, signaling, gene co-expression, homology and cancer-gene networks. Predicted network modules were tested for association with complex traits and diseases using a unique collection of 180 genome-wide association studies. Our robust assessment of 75 module identification methods reveals top-performing algorithms, which recover complementary trait-associated modules. We find that most of these modules …
Total citations
20182019202020212022202320245134071626423
Scholar articles