Authors
Bradley S Jorgensen, Geoffrey J Syme, Brian J Bishop, Blair E Nancarrow
Publication date
1999/7
Journal
Environmental and resource economics
Volume
14
Pages
131-150
Publisher
Kluwer Academic Publishers
Description
A significant number of respondents to contingent valuation surveys tend to either state a zero bid, or refuse to state a bid at all, for reasons associated with the process of valuation. These protest responses are routinely removed from contingent valuation samples because it is assumed that they are not indicative of respondents’ ‘true’ values. The censoring of protest responses has led to the emergence of a definitional controversy. One view is that the definition of protest responses and the rules for censoring them are dependent on whether the practitioner conceives of the contingent valuation survey as a market or as a referendum. However, what is not acknowledged is the possibility that protest responses and their meaning may vary according to the type of good being valued, the elicitation format, and the interaction between these elements and external factors. This potential renders the development of …
Total citations
199920002001200220032004200520062007200820092010201120122013201420152016201720182019202020212022202320241547915319815122020251816131916211616811104
Scholar articles
BS Jorgensen, GJ Syme, BJ Bishop, BE Nancarrow - Environmental and resource economics, 1999
BS Jorgensen, GJ Syme, BJ Bishop, BE Nancarrow - 1999