Authors
Heather L Colquhoun, Danielle Levac, Kelly K O'Brien, Sharon Straus, Andrea C Tricco, Laure Perrier, Monika Kastner, David Moher
Publication date
2014/12/1
Journal
Journal of clinical epidemiology
Volume
67
Issue
12
Pages
1291-1294
Publisher
Pergamon
Description
Objectives
The scoping review has become increasingly popular as a form of knowledge synthesis. However, a lack of consensus on scoping review terminology, definition, methodology, and reporting limits the potential of this form of synthesis. In this article, we propose recommendations to further advance the field of scoping review methodology.
Study Design and Setting
We summarize current understanding of scoping review publication rates, terms, definitions, and methods. We propose three recommendations for clarity in term, definition and methodology.
Results
We recommend adopting the terms “scoping review” or “scoping study” and the use of a proposed definition. Until such time as further guidance is developed, we recommend the use of the methodological steps outlined in the Arksey and O'Malley framework and further enhanced by Levac et al. The development of reporting guidance for the conduct …
Total citations
20152016201720182019202020212022202320242257140196312424568478464215
Scholar articles
HL Colquhoun, D Levac, KK O'Brien, S Straus… - Journal of clinical epidemiology, 2014