Authors
Emily A Leskinen, Lilia M Cortina, Dana B Kabat
Publication date
2011/2/1
Journal
Law and human behavior
Volume
35
Issue
1
Pages
25-39
Publisher
Springer US
Description
This study challenges the common legal and organizational practice of privileging sexual advance forms of sex-based harassment, while neglecting gender harassment. Survey data came from women working in two male-dominated contexts: the military and the legal profession. Their responses to the Sexual Experiences Questionnaire (SEQ) revealed five typical profiles of harassment: low victimization, gender harassment, gender harassment with unwanted sexual attention, moderate victimization, and high victimization. The vast majority of harassment victims fell into one of the first two groups, which described virtually no unwanted sexual advances. When compared to non-victims, gender-harassed women showed significant decrements in professional and psychological well-being. These findings underscore the seriousness of gender harassment, which merits greater attention by both law and social science.
Total citations
2011201220132014201520162017201820192020202120222023202424141616191619243449362819
Scholar articles