Authors
Blair Schoene, James L Crowley, Daniel J Condon, Mark D Schmitz, Samuel A Bowring
Publication date
2006/1/15
Journal
Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta
Volume
70
Issue
2
Pages
426-445
Publisher
Pergamon
Description
As the internal precision of radiometric dates approaches the 0.1% level, systematic biases between different methods have become apparent. Many workers have suggested that calibrating other decay constants against the U–Pb system is a viable solution to this problem. We test this assertion empirically and quantitatively by analyzing U–Pb systematics of zircon and xenotime on the single- to sub-grain scale by high-precision ID-TIMS geochronology on 11 rock samples ranging from 0.1 to 3.3Ga. Large statistically equivalent datasets give 207Pb/206Pb dates that are systematically older than 206Pb/238U dates by ∼0.15% in Precambrian samples to as much as ∼3.3% in Mesozoic samples, suggesting inaccuracies in the mean values of one or both of the U decay constants. These data are used to calculate a ratio of the U decay constants that is lower than the accepted ratio by 0.09% and is a factor of 5 more …
Total citations
200620072008200920102011201220132014201520162017201820192020202120222023202412252620423231221825282935282731273232
Scholar articles
B Schoene, JL Crowley, DJ Condon, MD Schmitz… - Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, 2006