Authors
Martine J Piccart, Kamma Bertelsen, Keith James, Jim Cassidy, Constantino Mangioni, Ernst Simonsen, Gavin Stuart, Stan Kaye, Ignace Vergote, René Blom, Robert Grimshaw, Ronald J Atkinson, Ken D Swenerton, Claes Trope, Mario Nardi, Janne Kaern, Salvatore Tumolo, Petra Timmers, Josée-Anne Roy, François Lhoas, Berit Lindvall, Monica Bacon, Angelo Birt, Joern Erik Andersen, Benny Zee, James Paul, Benoît Baron, Sergio Pecorelli
Publication date
2000/5/3
Journal
Journal of the National Cancer Institute
Volume
92
Issue
9
Pages
699-708
Publisher
Oxford University Press
Description
Background: A randomized trial conducted by the Gynecologic Oncology Group (GOG, study #111) in the United States showed a better outcome for patients with advanced ovarian cancer on the paclitaxel–cisplatin regimen than for those on a standard cyclophosphamide–cisplatin regimen. Before considering the paclitaxel–cisplatin regimen as the new “standard,” a group of European and Canadian investigators planned a confirmatory phase III trial. Methods: This intergroup trial recruited 680 patients with broader selection criteria than the GOG #111 study and administered paclitaxel as a 3-hour instead of a 24-hour infusion; progression-free survival was the primary end point. Patient survival was analyzed by use of the Kaplan–Meier technique. Treatment effects on patient survival were estimated by Cox proportional hazards regression models. All statistical tests were two-sided. Results: The overall …
Total citations
20002001200220032004200520062007200820092010201120122013201420152016201720182019202020212022202320249416810193767568706169596051563743383641333630168