Authors
John R Pannell, Josh R Auld, Yaniv Brandvain, Martin Burd, Jeremiah W Busch, Pierre‐Olivier Cheptou, Jeffrey K Conner, Emma E Goldberg, Alannie‐Grace Grant, Dena L Grossenbacher, Stephen M Hovick, Boris Igic, Susan Kalisz, Theodora Petanidou, April M Randle, Rafael Rubio de Casas, Anton Pauw, Jana C Vamosi, Alice A Winn
Publication date
2015/11
Source
New Phytologist
Volume
208
Issue
3
Pages
656-667
Description
Baker's law refers to the tendency for species that establish on islands by long‐distance dispersal to show an increased capacity for self‐fertilization because of the advantage of self‐compatibility when colonizing new habitat. Despite its intuitive appeal and broad empirical support, it has received substantial criticism over the years since it was proclaimed in the 1950s, not least because it seemed to be contradicted by the high frequency of dioecy on islands. Recent theoretical work has again questioned the generality and scope of Baker's law. Here, we attempt to discern where the idea is useful to apply and where it is not. We conclude that several of the perceived problems with Baker's law fall away when a narrower perspective is adopted on how it should be circumscribed. We emphasize that Baker's law should be read in terms of an enrichment of a capacity for uniparental reproduction in colonizing situations …
Total citations
20152016201720182019202020212022202320241192728222222222819
Scholar articles
JR Pannell, JR Auld, Y Brandvain, M Burd, JW Busch… - New Phytologist, 2015